โFeb-15-2020 09:58 AM
โFeb-18-2020 06:22 PM
Gdetrailer wrote:None of my digital cameras have a screen even vaguely resembling what you have posted. What program is that screenshot from? This is what show in W10 for my little camera: 180dpi, file size 6.06MBjoebedford wrote:
"Most cameras default to 72 DPI and at 10 Mega pixels results in a photo with a "native size" of 64"x 48"."
Uhhhh, whut?
:R
UMM, YEAH.
HERE YOU GO..
That is a screen capture of the DEFAULTS of a 10 mega pixel picture, I have not altered or changed this file in any way.
โFeb-18-2020 05:58 PM
โFeb-18-2020 05:43 PM
โFeb-18-2020 03:29 PM
joebedford wrote:
"Most cameras default to 72 DPI and at 10 Mega pixels results in a photo with a "native size" of 64"x 48"."
Uhhhh, whut?
โFeb-17-2020 08:39 AM
โFeb-17-2020 06:16 AM
โFeb-16-2020 07:05 PM
โFeb-16-2020 06:10 PM
โFeb-16-2020 05:15 PM
ksg5000 wrote:
Another alternative - large memory sticks are dirt cheap now and you can load your completed project on a stick and send one to each family member. Just a thought.
โFeb-16-2020 01:04 PM
BobsYourUncle wrote:
Again, more great input from all, thank you.
It isn't likely that any of us will be printing these pics. Maybe a select few will ever see the printer.
The primary recipients of my work are 2 brothers.
One of my brothers is heavily into photography and does extensive photo editing of his work. He lives in Cabo Mexico and does a lot of wildlife photography there. He, like myself is picky about quality and detail.
Amongst the 3 of us, we have 12 children. They likely don't care as much about high quality as my one brother and I do. But if I am going to scan them, why not do hi res pics instead of low? High can be reduced, but low cannot be increased.
Most of us, including the kids, have large smart TVs. The viewing device of choice will mostly be showing them on these large screens. Therefore, the higher the quality, the better for seeing a 4 foot wide image. I ran a few on mine and I like the quality..
โFeb-16-2020 12:49 PM
โFeb-16-2020 12:00 PM
Fizz wrote:
Do a bit of experimentation first, see what size you can get away with.
โFeb-16-2020 11:57 AM
Fizz wrote:While that's literally true, there are a lot more pixels in a 4K TV: 3,840x2,160 than plain old HD: 1920x1080
Doesn't matter how large your TV is you don't get more pixels they're just bigger.
โFeb-16-2020 08:56 AM