Mar-29-2020 09:35 AM
Aug-10-2021 06:12 PM
Aug-10-2021 11:14 AM
opnspaces wrote:
What's missing? The perceived lack of thought about the roads and obstacles to getting to and into the site. I've been to a few that have a tree or big rock right at the corner of the site and the road. This and narrow access roads make backing in a pain in the rear. Flare the ends of the sites a bit so it's easier to cut the corner when backing.
Aug-10-2021 10:58 AM
down home wrote:
Designing a park to maximize profits, or sardine sites will eliminate the RVing experience. People will stay once and only again if nothing else is available...for one night.
Mar-31-2020 05:08 PM
Mar-30-2020 04:39 PM
2oldman wrote:
Steamboat rock?
Mar-30-2020 01:24 PM
Dutch_12078 wrote:You found a hole in the trees.
We prefer state and national park campgrounds,
Mar-30-2020 01:17 PM
Dutch_12078 wrote:I need to follow you around, as I find that a great site, water & electric would make it better, FHU would be even better, but then you would probably never find availability as Everyone would want to be there.
We prefer state and national park campgrounds, so I guess if I was wishing, more of them would offer full hookups. We do prefer parks with large sites and lots of foliage like this one:
Mar-30-2020 11:14 AM
Mar-30-2020 05:50 AM
Mar-30-2020 05:42 AM
SkyWriting wrote:
MY answer is "Trees". When I was a Boy Scout we were surrounded by trees.
....but what is your BIGGEST shortcoming at the parks you stay at?
Mar-29-2020 11:03 PM
Mar-29-2020 09:47 PM
Mar-29-2020 06:35 PM
MitchF150 wrote:
This..
Mar-29-2020 06:32 PM
K Charles wrote:
What I like for one night is not what I like for a weekend. What I like in the spring is not the same as fall. Some times we visit relatives and sometimes we go to the beach, there is no way to pick just one best.